|
Introduction
to Hypersonic Flight
During much of the early reentry
period the space shuttle travels at 1hypersonic
speed which, for the purposes of calculating heat transfer
and thermodynamic properties, is distinctly different from 2supersonic
and 2subsonic
speeds. Hypersonic flight
differs from super sonic flight in that it has a separate distinct region
between the shock wave and the 3boundary layer known as the 4shock
layer. In the
shock layer kinetic energy is turned into heat so temperature, pressure and or density may change by a factor of 2 or
more. This happens when air molecules pass through the shock wave and are
excited to higher vibrational and chemical energy modes. As more energy is
absorbed by the air molecules the nitrogen and oxygen molecules begin to disassociate
creating ionized particles or forming an 5ionized
plasma. The major sources of increased heating during
supersonic and hypersonic flight are skin and fluid friction as the atmospheric
gasses pass over the surface of the aircraft and compression of the gas molecules
as they pass through the boundary of the shock wave.
Technical Footnotes:
-
Generally considered to be between Mach
5 to 23.
-
Super sonic flow exists between Mach 1
to 4. Subsonic or
transitional flow exists between Mach .85 to 1, (also called transonic
flight).
-
The supersonic boundary layer is thin and
considered negligible whereas the thickness of the hypersonic boundary layer can
be calculated and increases with increasing mach numbers.
This creates a detached shock wave and allows for the typical blunt nose design
of hypersonic aircraft. This keeps the high temperatures from the
free stream and stagnation point away from the body of the aircraft.
-
The region
around the orbiter which contains the shock
layer may also be referred to as an aerothermodynamic
environment.
-
The ionic nature of the gasses surrounding any
reentering spacecraft has traditionally made communications between the spacecraft and
ground control difficult because radio waves cannot penetrate the
plasma which exists around the lower portion of the vehicle.
|
Sonic
Shock Waves and Boundary Layer Flow
Shock
wave formation:
Fig.
C1 represents the regions that
form around the space shuttle when it is in hypersonic flight. Although
properties of the gas may change radically from one side of the shock wave to the other,
the gasses must still obey thermodynamic laws and specifically equilibrium by
maintaining the energy budget across the shock wave and boundary layer.
Fig.
C1
 |
6Example
Eqn. C1 |
|

|
| Using
Eqn. C1, if some of the free stream
conditions are known, many of the properties in the shock layer and boundary
layer can be calculated. The temperatures in the shock layer will easily
reach 2500 to 3500°F. |
|
Technical
Footnotes:
- Eqn.
C1
is a simplification of hypersonic flow
calculations taken from super sonic theory. The perfect gas law is
not necessarily accurate due to the chemical reactions that occur in the
hypersonic shock layer. It is simply intended to show how the
properties within the different regions can be calculated. The document,
Hypersonic_Flow_Calcs.pdf,
contains a more accurate description of hypersonic flow theory.
|
It should also be
noted the many things about super sonic shock waves are very predictable and can
easily be calculated. Many properties of the fluid flow on either side of
the shock wave can be calculated accurately, see
Eqn. C1, assuming
that you know the current state of the atmosphere at the altitude the
calculations are being done for. The angle that the shock wave comes off
the skin of the object that is creating it can also be calculated. The
basic parameters needed for the calculation are the Mach number, the aerodynamic
properties of the atmosphere and the basic shape of the objects leading edge.
Laminar flow:
By definition the gasses in the
boundary layer are 7incompressible and move over the body of the orbiter with 8laminar
flow. (This is opposed to turbulent flow which
results in excessive heating during shuttle reentry). The laminar flow helps to keep the superheated gasses from coming into prolonged direct contact with the
thermal tiles on the windward surface of the shuttle. In this way the boundary
layer separates the wall of the shuttle from the super heated ionized plasma and
actually works to protect
the vehicle from the effects of reentry heating.
|
Technical
Footnotes:
- The gasses are in a steady state throughout the boundary layer where the
temperature is much less than in the shock layer and the velocity
is less than free stream conditions.
-
The gas particles in the boundary layer travel only parallel to the body of
the orbiter.
|
Turbulent flow:
At a point during
reentry, usually around Mach 8, the laminar flow trips to turbulent which
dramatically increases the heating of the orbiters skin and tiles. This is
why the Time Vs. Temperature chart,
Fig. C2, for reentry shows a violent upswing in
temperature at the 1300 sec. mark while the heating appears to be decreasing. Turbulent flow may occur sooner during reentry primarily if
the flow is tripped artificially by the edge of a surface on the orbiter, a
rough wing surface or by meteorological
conditions. When this happens, as it did on STS-73, (cause unknown), it increases the
heat of reentry tremendously and typically causes damage to the TPS that
requires greater than usual effort to repair before the next flight. Turbulent flow caused by a
defect on the surface of the orbiter will most likely be confined to a small area
aft of the surface anomaly that tripped the flow. Excessive turbulent flow
has never placed an orbiter or crew in danger during reentry.
Fig. C2

Missing tiles and turbulent flow:
Fig. C3 is a good representation of how fluid in the boundary layer flows over gaps
in the TPS without letting super heated plasma get near the skin of the space
shuttle. This is not to say that missing tiles are not a reason for
concern. Missing tiles hurt the shuttle's performance and increase the
probability of having a burn through of the outer skin. Obviously a very
small number of missing tiles has almost no effect but as the number of lost
tiles increases so do the shuttle's problems. This is why the reasons for
the loss of the tiles must always be determined. The following animation
is only meant to show that a small number of missing tiles spread out over a
large area will not cause the loss of a shuttle.
Fig. C3

Because the boundary layer flow is
both laminar and incompressible it creates a natural barrier between the exposed
skin of the orbiter and the ionized plasma in the shock layer. This means that any gaps in
the TPS may be passed over with most of the fluid flow crossing over
the gap and not entering it, although this does depends on the size of the gap. The trailing
edge of the gap will cause the flow to become turbulent just aft of the opening. If the flow is already turbulent then more of the plasma
may enter
the gap and contact the skin although not as much as the typically smooth
and uniform areas
around the defect.
The Wing
Leading Edge and RCC Material
RCC
Panels:
The RCC material on the orbiters protects
the surface underneath through ablation. Ablation means that tiny
particles of carbon are coming off the material during reentry.
During every reentry the RCC material loses some mass and after so many
flights must be replaced. One issue throughout the space shuttle
program has been the formation of pinholes in the material. These
holes were found to be the result of impurities within the Reinforced Carbon
Carbon material. When the holes are found during post flight inspection, the panels are repaired or
replaced. These openings have never resulted in hot plasma entering
the shuttles wing.
|
Fig. C4
 |
Fig. C4
is an exploded view of the RCC panel assemblies that are attached to the
front of both wings on the Space Shuttle. All of the hardware is shown
in addition to the 1/2" aluminum plate that lies behind the RCC panels.
For additional views of the RCC
panel assemblies see
Fig. F7,
Fig. F8,
Fig. F9 and
Fig. F10
from Page F. |
Stagnation
heating:
The point
right at dead center front of the shock wave is called the stagnation point, see
Fig. C5. This is where the highest temperatures occur and they are known as
stagnation temperatures and or stagnation heating. As
long as the orbiter is reentering the atmosphere with the blunt nose forward and
the body at the correct Angle of Attack (AOA) the hypersonic shockwave is simply pushed along by
the shuttle some distance in front of it. This keeps the hot gasses from
coming into direct contact with the shuttles skin and TPS material. If the
shuttles attitude changes so that an edge with a shape other than the blunt nose
faces forward, such as a wing tip, the shockwave may touch the shuttle
subjecting it to stagnation heating and subsequent damage.
The areas of the shuttle that have stagnation
points are the nose, the leading edges of the wings and the leading edge of the
tail.
|
Fig. C5 is a cross section of the
the Space Shuttle Wing Leading Edge
(WLE). When the shuttle is traveling with an AOA of
40˚ the stagnation point will be at the approximate location shown. If the shuttle were
flying level, (AOA = 0˚), the stagnation
point would then be at the location of the center line.
Data taken during shuttle flights verifies
the exact location of the stagnation point, (see
Fig. D4,
Fig. D5,
Fig.
D6 and
Fig. D7
from Page D -
Temperature Variations During
Orbit and Reentry of the Space Shuttle).
If the debris
impact during the ascent of STS-107 caused what has been described by the
official investigation as, "a dinner plate size hole"
(the hole produced by impact testing was 16" x 17"), in RCC
Panels #8 or 9
Fig. C6
should give some idea of the effect that damage would have on the shuttle's
aerodynamic properties.
There is venting between the cavity that
exists within the RCC Panel and the rest of the wing that equalizes the
air pressure between the two areas during reentry. The rate of flow
that would occur through these vents is unknown but for the purposes of
pressure equalization it would be minimal.
Therefore some movement
of hot material may occur through the wing as described in the official
final report, but in order for the type of flow that would destroy the
wing there needs to be an outlet back to atmosphere which does not exist
unless specific vent doors that are closed during the first half of
reentry are opened manually.
It is just unlikely that the complex path
that exists from the suggested wing breach back to an outlet to atmosphere
would result in a significant enough flow to cause damage. It is
also important to remember that heated material which enters the cavity
will begin to cool down quickly, especially plasma which is defined by the
speed of its free electrons. |
|
Fig. C5
 |
|
Fig. C6
 |
|
|
UPDATE:
09/10/2003
An
e-mail received on 09/02/2003 regarding the functioning of the RCC
material contained the
following comments,
Issue:
"The
RCC material on the orbiters protects the surface underneath through
ablation. Ablation means that tiny particles of carbon are coming
off the material during reentry. During every reentry the RCC
material loses some mass and after so
many flights must be replaced."
According
to NASA information about RCC at
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/technology/sts-newsref/sts_sys.html#sts-rcc
"To
provide oxidation resistance for reuse capability, the outer
layers of the RCC are
converted to silicon carbide. The RCC is packed in a retort
with a dry pack material made up of a mixture of alumina, silicon
and silicon carbide. The retort is
placed in a furnace, and the coating conversion
process takes place in argon with a stepped-time-temperature
cycle up to 3,200 F. A diffusion
reaction occurs between the dry pack and
carbon-carbon in which the outer layers of the carbon-carbon are
converted to silicon carbide
(whitish-gray color) with no thickness increase.
It is this silicon-carbide coating that protects the carbon-carbon
from oxidation."
Ablative
heat shields let the outer layers burn away--carrying off the
heat. The RCC absorbs the heat.
Also--the
CAIB Working Scenario has a section on RCC design:
>From
page 10-7 in Section 10.5:
"Most
RCC panels are designed with a 100-mission fatigue life"
Again
this points to the fact that RCC is not ablative.
Web
Page: http://www.columbiassacrifice.com/reentry.htm
Cordially,
Matt
-
--
Matthew
D. Markham
The
exact functioning of the RCC material does not impact the final
results of the Columbia investigation.
|
|
Page
Notes:
Although aerodynamic
heating and hypersonic
atmospheric flight are two subjects that need not be
separated, the main objective of this page is to distinguish between the
different flight regimes, (subsonic, transonic,
supersonic and hypersonic), and discuss how they affect
airflow around aerodynamic bodies of different shapes. There is
also the aspect of plasma formation around the vehicle during hypersonic
flight. The paragraph below about stagnation
heating has an accompanying heat rate equation
Eqn.
A1-1. |
Plasma
Formation
Angle
of Attack
Angle of attack plays the most significant role in how plasma
forms around the shuttle and where heat is concentrated. The shuttle's
extreme Angle of Attack of 40° is difficult to maintain but helps to slow the
rate of descent more than any other method.
Fig. C7 shows how the
hypersonic boundary layer affects the shuttle during two different reentry
scenarios. One is the standard Angle of Attack while the other shows what
would happen without AOA control.
Fig. C7

Communications:
Another problem caused by hypersonic
flight and ionized plasma was the10 minute blackout period that spacecraft
traditionally went through during the early part of reentry. The
ionized plasma that formed underneath a spacecraft as the result of hypersonic
flight made transmitting radio communications down through the atmosphere
impossible, (the communication signal simply could not pass through the
electrically charged field created by the plasma), see
Fig. C8 for a diagram of the areas blocked by plasma and the subsequent
direction of signal transmission. This problem was solved with the completion of the Tracking
and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS) array which allowed reentering space craft to
beam signals upward back into space and then relay them back down to mission
control. For sending communications the shuttle relies on four
hemispherical shaped S-Band PM (Phase Modulation) antennas mounted to the body
of the orbiter on the forward fuselage and located 90° apart at the upper left
and upper right, lower left and lower right,
Fig. C9A
and C9B
are photos of the actual S-Band antennas located at the four quadrants for
transmitting to the TDRS system.
Fig. C8

Fig. C9A & C9B
S-Band Antennas
For the purpose of transmitting data
to the ground only there are two S-Band FM (Frequency
Modulation) antennas located on the forward fuselage on the top and
bottom of the orbiter. For receiving voice and data communications as well
as return link or communicating back down to
Mission Control there are four S-Band PM (Phase Modulation) antennas located on
the forward fuselage with one at each of the four quadrants. All of the communication systems on the orbiter
have more than one redundant backup so that except in the event of a
catastrophic structural failure of the orbiter there should never be a loss of
communication with the shuttle.
Fig. C10 and
Fig. C11 show the
location of all S-Band, L-Band and Ku-Band antennas on the space shuttle.
All antennas mounted to the body of the orbiter are covered with TPS material.
|
Fig. C10 |
Fig. C11 |
 |
 |
Fig. C12 shows how the shuttle transmits back up to the TDRS system and then
relays the signal back down to mission control.
Fig. C12

|
Page
Notes:
Reference documents
for this page are available on the "Download" page under
Hypersonic
Flight. |
|