Go To Home Page

Effects of Hypersonic Flow During Reentry
of the Space Shuttle
Page C

Updated 10/25/2007

 
 
 

 

Website Navigation and Document Access Pull Down Menu

 

 
 

Breakup and Debris Field

Temperature Variations During Flight

     
 

Introduction to Hypersonic Flight

During much of the early reentry period the space shuttle travels at 1hypersonic speed which, for the purposes of calculating heat transfer and thermodynamic properties, is distinctly different from 2supersonic and 2subsonic speeds.  Hypersonic flight differs from super sonic flight in that it has a separate distinct region between the shock wave and the 3boundary layer known as the 4shock layer.  In the shock layer kinetic energy is turned into heat so temperature, pressure and or density may change by a factor of 2 or more.  This happens when air molecules pass through the shock wave and are excited to higher vibrational and chemical energy modes.  As more energy is absorbed by the air molecules the nitrogen and oxygen molecules begin to disassociate creating ionized particles or forming an 5ionized plasma.  The major sources of increased heating during supersonic and hypersonic flight are skin and fluid friction as the atmospheric gasses pass over the surface of the aircraft and compression of the gas molecules as they pass through the boundary of the shock wave.

Technical Footnotes:
  1. Generally considered to be between Mach 5 to 23.

  2. Super sonic flow exists between Mach 1 to 4.  Subsonic or transitional flow exists between Mach .85 to 1, (also called transonic flight).

  3. The supersonic boundary layer is thin and considered negligible whereas the thickness of the hypersonic boundary layer can be calculated and increases with increasing mach numbers.  This creates a detached shock wave and allows for the typical blunt nose design of hypersonic aircraft.  This keeps the high temperatures from the free stream and stagnation point away from the body of the aircraft.

  4. The region around the orbiter which contains the shock layer may also be referred to as an aerothermodynamic environment.

  5. The ionic nature of the gasses surrounding any reentering spacecraft has traditionally made communications between the spacecraft and ground control difficult because radio waves cannot penetrate the plasma which exists around the lower portion of the vehicle.

Sonic Shock Waves and Boundary Layer Flow

Shock wave formation:

Fig. C1 represents the regions that form around the space shuttle when it is in hypersonic flight.  Although properties of the gas  may change radically from one side of the shock wave to the other, the gasses must still obey thermodynamic laws and specifically equilibrium by maintaining the energy budget across the shock wave and boundary layer.

Fig. C1

6Example  Eqn. C1
  • If it is assumed that the gas is   thermally perfect, the following equation can be used,

Using Eqn. C1, if some of the free stream conditions are known, many of the properties in the shock layer and boundary layer can be calculated.  The temperatures in the shock layer will easily reach 2500 to 3500°F.

 

Technical Footnotes:

  1. Eqn. C1 is a simplification of hypersonic flow calculations taken from super sonic theory.  The perfect gas law is not necessarily accurate due to the chemical reactions that occur in the hypersonic shock layer.  It is simply intended to show how the properties within the different regions can be calculated.  The document, Hypersonic_Flow_Calcs.pdf, contains a more accurate description of hypersonic flow theory.

It should also be noted the many things about super sonic shock waves are very predictable and can easily be calculated.  Many properties of the fluid flow on either side of the shock wave can be calculated accurately, see Eqn. C1, assuming that you know the current state of the atmosphere at the altitude the calculations are being done for.  The angle that the shock wave comes off the skin of the object that is creating it can also be calculated.  The basic parameters needed for the calculation are the Mach number, the aerodynamic properties of the atmosphere and the basic shape of the objects leading edge.

Laminar flow:

By definition the gasses in the boundary layer are 7incompressible and move over the body of the orbiter with 8laminar flow(This is opposed to turbulent flow which results in excessive heating during shuttle reentry).  The laminar flow helps to keep the superheated gasses from coming into prolonged direct contact with the thermal tiles on the windward surface of the shuttle.  In this way the boundary layer separates the wall of the shuttle from the super heated ionized plasma and actually works to protect the vehicle from the effects of reentry heating.

Technical Footnotes:

  1. The gasses are in a steady state throughout the boundary layer where the temperature is much less than in the shock layer and the velocity is less than free stream conditions.
  2. The gas particles in the boundary layer travel only parallel to the body of the orbiter.

Turbulent flow:
At a point during reentry, usually around Mach 8, the laminar flow trips to turbulent which dramatically increases the heating of the orbiters skin and tiles.  This is why the Time Vs. Temperature chart, Fig. C2, for reentry shows a violent upswing in temperature at the 1300 sec. mark while the heating appears to be decreasing.  Turbulent flow may occur sooner during reentry primarily if the flow is tripped artificially by the edge of a surface on the orbiter, a rough wing surface or by meteorological conditions.  When this happens, as it did on STS-73, (cause unknown),  it increases the heat of reentry tremendously and typically causes damage to the TPS that requires greater than usual effort to repair before the next flight.  Turbulent flow caused by a defect on the surface of the orbiter will most likely be confined to a small area aft of the surface anomaly that tripped the flow.  Excessive turbulent flow has never placed an orbiter or crew in danger during reentry.

Fig. C2

Missing tiles and turbulent flow:

Fig. C3 is a good representation of how fluid in the boundary layer flows over gaps in the TPS without letting super heated plasma get near the skin of the space shuttle.  This is not to say that missing tiles are not a reason for concern.  Missing tiles hurt the shuttle's performance and increase the probability of having a burn through of the outer skin.  Obviously a very small number of missing tiles has almost no effect but as the number of lost tiles increases so do the shuttle's problems.  This is why the reasons for the loss of the tiles must always be determined.  The following animation is only meant to show that a small number of missing tiles spread out over a large area will not cause the loss of a shuttle.

Fig. C3

Because the boundary layer flow is both laminar and incompressible it creates a natural barrier between the exposed skin of the orbiter and the ionized plasma in the shock layer.  This means that any gaps in the TPS may be passed over with most of the fluid flow crossing over the gap and not entering it, although this does depends on the size of the gap.  The trailing edge of the gap will cause the flow to become turbulent just aft of the opening.  If the flow is already turbulent then more of the plasma may enter the gap and contact the skin although not as much as the typically smooth and  uniform areas around the defect.

The Wing Leading Edge and RCC Material

RCC Panels:

The RCC material on the orbiters protects the surface underneath through ablation.  Ablation means that tiny particles of carbon are coming off the material during reentry.  During every reentry the RCC material loses some mass and after so many flights must be replaced.  One issue throughout the space shuttle program has been the formation of pinholes in the material.  These holes were found to be the result of impurities within the Reinforced Carbon Carbon material.  When the holes are found during post flight inspection, the panels are repaired or replaced.  These openings have never resulted in hot plasma entering the shuttles wing.

Fig. C4

Fig. C4 is an exploded view of the RCC panel assemblies that are attached to the front of both wings on the Space Shuttle.  All of the hardware is shown in addition to the 1/2" aluminum plate that lies behind the RCC panels.

For additional views of the RCC panel assemblies see Fig. F7, Fig. F8, Fig. F9 and Fig. F10 from Page F.

Stagnation heating:

The point right at dead center front of the shock wave is called the stagnation point, see Fig. C5.  This is where the highest temperatures occur and they are known as stagnation temperatures and or stagnation heating.  As long as the orbiter is reentering the atmosphere with the blunt nose forward and the body at the correct Angle of Attack (AOA) the hypersonic shockwave is simply pushed along by the shuttle some distance in front of it.  This keeps the hot gasses from coming into direct contact with the shuttles skin and TPS material.  If the shuttles attitude changes so that an edge with a shape other than the blunt nose faces forward, such as a wing tip,  the shockwave may touch the shuttle subjecting it to stagnation heating and subsequent damage.  The areas of the shuttle that have stagnation points are the nose, the leading edges of the wings and the leading edge of the tail.

Fig. C5 is a cross section of the the Space Shuttle Wing Leading Edge (WLE).  When the shuttle is traveling with an AOA of 40˚ the stagnation point will be at the approximate location shown.  If the shuttle were flying level, (AOA = 0˚), the stagnation point would then be at the location of the center line.

Data taken during shuttle flights verifies the exact location of the stagnation point, (see Fig. D4, Fig. D5, Fig. D6 and Fig. D7 from Page D - Temperature Variations During Orbit and Reentry of the Space Shuttle).

If the debris impact during the ascent of STS-107 caused what has been described by the official investigation as, "a dinner plate size hole" (the hole produced by impact testing was 16" x 17"), in RCC Panels #8 or 9 Fig. C6 should give some idea of the effect that damage would have on the shuttle's aerodynamic properties.


There is venting between the cavity that exists within the RCC Panel and the rest of the wing that equalizes the air pressure between the two areas during reentry.  The rate of flow that would occur through these vents is unknown but for the purposes of pressure equalization it would be minimal.

Therefore some movement of hot material may occur through the wing as described in the official final report, but in order for the type of flow that would destroy the wing there needs to be an outlet back to atmosphere which does not exist unless specific vent doors that are closed during the first half of reentry are opened manually.

It is just unlikely that the complex path that exists from the suggested wing breach back to an outlet to atmosphere would result in a significant enough flow to cause damage.  It is also important to remember that heated material which enters the cavity will begin to cool down quickly, especially plasma which is defined by the speed of its free electrons.

Fig. C5

Fig. C6

 

UPDATE: 09/10/2003

An e-mail received on 09/02/2003 regarding the functioning of the RCC material contained the following comments,

Issue:

"The RCC material on the orbiters protects the surface underneath through ablation. Ablation means that tiny particles of carbon are coming off the material during reentry. During every reentry the RCC material loses some mass and after so many flights must be replaced."

According to NASA information about RCC at

http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/technology/sts-newsref/sts_sys.html#sts-rcc

"To provide oxidation resistance for reuse capability, the outer layers of the RCC are converted to silicon carbide. The RCC is packed in a retort with a dry pack material made up of a mixture of alumina, silicon and silicon carbide. The retort is placed in a furnace, and the coating conversion process takes place in argon with a stepped-time-temperature cycle up to 3,200 F. A diffusion reaction occurs between the dry pack and carbon-carbon in which the outer layers of the carbon-carbon are converted to silicon carbide (whitish-gray color) with no thickness increase. It is this silicon-carbide coating that protects the carbon-carbon from oxidation."

Ablative heat shields let the outer layers burn away--carrying off the heat. The RCC absorbs the heat.

Also--the CAIB Working Scenario has a section on RCC design:

>From page 10-7 in Section 10.5:

"Most RCC panels are designed with a 100-mission fatigue life"

Again this points to the fact that RCC is not ablative.

Web Page: http://www.columbiassacrifice.com/reentry.htm

Cordially,

Matt

- --

Matthew D. Markham

The exact functioning of the RCC material does not impact the final results of the Columbia investigation.

Page Notes:

Although aerodynamic heating and hypersonic atmospheric flight are two subjects that need not be separated, the main objective of this page is to distinguish between the different flight regimes, (subsonic, transonic, supersonic and hypersonic), and discuss how they affect airflow around aerodynamic bodies of different shapes.  There is also the aspect of plasma formation around the vehicle during hypersonic flight.  The paragraph below about stagnation heating has an accompanying heat rate equation Eqn. A1-1.

Plasma Formation

Angle of Attack

Angle of attack plays the most significant role in how plasma forms around the shuttle and where heat is concentrated.  The shuttle's extreme Angle of Attack of 40° is difficult to maintain but helps to slow the rate of descent more than any other method.  Fig. C7 shows how the hypersonic boundary layer affects the shuttle during two different reentry scenarios.  One is the standard Angle of Attack while the other shows what would happen without AOA control.

Fig. C7

Communications:

Another problem caused by hypersonic flight and ionized plasma was the10 minute blackout period that spacecraft traditionally went through during the early part of reentry. The ionized plasma that formed underneath a spacecraft as the result of hypersonic flight made transmitting radio communications down through the atmosphere impossible, (the communication signal simply could not pass through the electrically charged field created by the plasma), see Fig. C8 for a diagram of the areas blocked by plasma and the subsequent direction of signal transmission.  This problem was solved with the completion of the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS) array which allowed reentering space craft to beam signals upward back into space and then relay them back down to mission control.   For sending communications the shuttle relies on four hemispherical shaped S-Band PM (Phase Modulation) antennas mounted to the body of the orbiter on the forward fuselage and located 90° apart at the upper left and upper right, lower left and lower right, Fig. C9A and C9B are photos of the actual S-Band antennas located at the four quadrants for transmitting to the TDRS system.

Fig. C8

Fig. C9A & C9B
S-Band Antennas

For the purpose of transmitting data to the ground only there are two S-Band FM (Frequency Modulation) antennas located on the forward fuselage on the top and bottom of the orbiter.  For receiving voice and data communications as well as return link or communicating back down to Mission Control there are four S-Band PM (Phase Modulation) antennas located on the forward fuselage with one at each of the four quadrants.  All of the communication systems on the orbiter have more than one redundant backup so that except in the event of a catastrophic structural failure of the orbiter there should never be a loss of communication with the shuttle.  Fig. C10 and Fig. C11 show the location of all S-Band, L-Band and Ku-Band antennas on the space shuttle.  All antennas mounted to the body of the orbiter are covered with TPS material.

Fig. C10 Fig. C11

Fig. C12 shows how the shuttle transmits back up to the TDRS system and then relays the signal back down to mission control.

Fig. C12

 

Page Notes:

Reference documents for this page are available on the "Download" page under Hypersonic Flight.

Copyright © 2003 - 2007 ColumbiasSacrifice.com
     

Breakup and Debris Field

Temperature Variations During Flight