|
The following individuals have been avid supporters of
Columbia's Sacrifice by either expressing positive views about the context of
the website in a public forum, and or, by actively contributing information
useful in determining what actually occurred on February 1, 2003.
Columbia's Sacrifice has not accepted and will not accept any outside monetary
contributions either towards the upkeep of the website or for any work done on
the site context. This site remains completely bipartisan and does not
seek to focus blame on any groups or individuals within NASA, the United States
Government or within the United States Military for the loss of the Columbia
Space Shuttle. If any individuals are named in connection with the loss of
Columbia or with an effort to cover-up the facts surrounding the loss of the
shuttle, it is because overwhelming factual evidence points in their direction.
The following article
was written by David Sadler:
2002 GOP Congressional Candidate, 12th CD/Illinois
2004.09.10 •
|
|
Columbia's Sacrifice
by David Sadler
david-sadler.org
2004.09.10 |
It might seem like ancient
history now and of little priority considering the war in Iraq, the
destruction of our economy and the constant appeal to fear coming out of
Washington, D.C, but the Columbia space shuttle disaster is still having
its affects upon our space program.
No space shuttle has flown since the breakup of Columbia over the
continental U.S. as it was making its reentry in preparation for landing.
Yes, there was a commission (an official investigation) into what caused
the disaster, and the block of foam insulation from the external fuel tank
hitting the left wing of Columbia was the first and last official
explanation for the ultimate demise of Columbia and its crew. But there is
still much disagreement on that conclusion from engineers both inside and
outside NASA.
The website,
Columbia's Sacrifice©, will challenge the lack
of engineering knowledge of non-engineers, and it will challenge qualified
engineers to reexamine the plausibility of the 'official' investigative
panel's conclusions regarding the cause.
Jon Hix and his colleagues have done an incredible job of pulling together
source documents and source footage of the Columbia disaster. Everything,
all the technical facts and timelines available, has been gathered and
organized for a very objective study of this tragic incident.
And as a sign of objectivity and total professionalism, Columbia's
Sacrifice states quite plainly that if anyone can dispute any evidence or
conclusions presented, simply contact them and provide the material, data
and analysis. The investigative team at Columbia's Sacrifice is ready to
modify its conclusions if warranted by evidence or analysis that falsifies
its primary conclusion that Columbia's fate rested not on foam hitting the
left wing upon launch, but by being subjected to an
EMP energy field
as it began its reentry into the earth's atmosphere.
Anyone who thinks this is a casual conclusion or who is offended by its
implications needs only to consume the incredible presentation of source
evidence and qualified analysis on this superbly organized website,
ColumbiasSacrifice.com.
As an introduction, I would suggest watching a flash video presentation of
the reentry and breakup of Columbia. Not because of its sensationalism,
but because we need to remember right from the start the tragedy involved.
In doing so, the viewer is going to be presented in this brief seven
minutes with several unanswered questions regarding the breakup and the
conflicts presented in the official explanation.
Next, read the Final Conclusions presented by this team of independent
investigators who are ready to modify their conclusions IF anyone can
falsify the current set.
Then, start at the beginning, and see what a remarkable feat these
individuals have accomplished. A tremendous amount of time and effort has
gone into this independent investigation out of a passion for their love
of the civilian space program and a search for a more probable cause of
the accident that better fits the documented
facts of the event.
Consider the huge amount of source data and documentation assembled and
catalogued for public review. Consider then their analytical methodology
leading to their current conclusions. These conclusions have vast and
unsettling implications for NASA and for the nation that lost its Columbia
space shuttle crew.
This Columbia flash video will take about 7 minutes to watch. On the
Macintosh, Safari would not play this flash demo. The Macintosh version of
Microsoft Internet Explorer would. There was no problem watching this on
the PC with Internet Explorer.
This flash presentation consists of sequential editing of all known video
(amateur and pro) of the Columbia reentry. NASA flight control
communications has been overlaid to match the video timeline. This
communication is heart wrenching as the systems aboard the Columbia begin
to fail and as the ground support team members at NASA begin to realize
that all is not well with Columbia as each mounting failure is reported to
'flight.'
•
Flash Video of reentry and flight comm (for
timeline, loss of signal and debris field purposes)
• ColumbiasSacrifice.com
Final
Conclusions
• Finally, here is the ColumbiasSacrifice.com
home page.
My thanks to Jon Hix for bringing his team's site to
our attention. |
External links:
•
google: Columbia Space Shuttle
•
NASA - Columbia - Home
|
The New American Civil War
What we have all been thinking
but afraid to say
 |
|
Within
the context of the first page of this website Norman D. Livergood
makes all of the statements we have all been thinking for maybe several
years but were afraid to say out loud. This is intended to be a
non-shooting war for the hearts and minds of the American people.
Those getting filthy rich from the current situation may be hard or
impossible to reach but fortunately they have made themselves a
profoundly small minority by choice.
The New American
Civil War |
This is just Phil's Web Site
It sounds simple enough but has
links to vast amounts of information.
Hi. I'm
Phil. |
|
It
would be an injustice to refer to Phil's Web Site as a list of
interesting links. Based on the quality of the web sites that are
linked to and the very short duration between when new links are posted
to the site it is obviously something that has considerable effort
involved in daily research. It would also be unwise to try and
classify the information that is posted there because much of it has not
been widely exposed before. The only thing that is certain is that
if you wish to learn something new today please visit
Phil's Web
Site.
http://www.phils.com.au/ |
|
