Website Navigation and Document Access Pull Down Menu

 
 
 
Go To Home Page Reentry of the Buran Space Shuttle

Updated 03/15/2004

Go To Mission Statement
 
     
 

Supplementary Page Navigation Menu

  1. Past and Present News Stories on STS-107

  2. Current Status of Each Space Shuttle

  3. Columbia's Most Recent Overhaul

  4. Reentry of the Buran Space Shuttle

  5. The History and Functioning of HAARP

 
     
 
Cligh on thumbnail to bring up larger image.

The main reason for studying the Buran (VKK Shuttle) as part of an investigation of what destroyed Columbia during the reentry of STS-107 is to examine the damage that the Buran returned with after its one orbital flight.  Because the design of the two orbiters is so similar damage done to one could provide clues as to the effects of that damage on the other.  The image directly to the left is a side and front view of the Buran-Energia launch stack, while the image to the right is of course the Space Shuttle launch stack.

The Buran's Short History

Buran's birth and death

The Buran (VKK Shuttle System) was another one of the "tit for tat" space programs that the Americans and Soviets had been engaged in during the space race that began in the 1950's with the launch of Sputnik.  In the effort  to develop a reusable launch vehicle that would presumably make space more accessible the Soviets were clearly behind with the launch of Columbia in 1981.  The Soviets were moving fast on the program though, and the first space worthy vehicle of several on the assembly line was the Buran.  It made a successful orbital flight, (2 orbits), on May 11, 1987 in an unmanned configuration because the lift support system had not been fully checked out.  However, upon its return it was discovered that the Buran suffered extensive heat damage during reentry and was deemed too costly to repair.  The Soviet Union was clearly in decline at this time and the reusable launch vehicle program was canceled.

Although the Soviets were building several VKK shuttles that were eventually meant for space flight, some of them were scrapped when the program itself was canceled and all the rest except for one were sold off to become amusement park rides and hot dog stands.  The vehicle bearing the name Buran that actually flew into space was the only one kept and stored at the Cosmodrome.  Although people still work in the half of the building that did not collapse there has not been any repair work done on the building and no attempt to clear the debris.  The destruction of the Buran has not been verified and there have been no reported attempts to remove it from the collapsed building either.  There have been a few rumors about returning it to service to replace the Columbia but as far as is currently known it is still laying under ruble.  Even if the Buran was to be recovered and repaired, the current tense political situation between Russia and Kazakhstan makes that possibility extremely remote.  The Russians have probably written the Buran off as having been destroyed by the collapse.

Images of the collapsed building are to the right.

The differences

Space Shuttle  Vs.  Buran 

A comparison of the American space shuttle on the left to the Buran on the right shows how similar the two orbiters look to each other.

The American Space Shuttle and the Soviet VKK  were so similar in design that an untrained eye might mistake one for the other.  There are a few big differences between the two.

The 2 main differences between the American Space Shuttle and the Buran are listed below.  Some references also list Buran's ability to operate and land without a pilot or by remote control as another advantage it has over the Space Shuttle.  However, the Space Shuttle has always had a lot of autopilot capabilities.  It is unknown if the Space Shuttle has always had an auto landing capability or if it has since been given that ability during one of the overhaul periods.

  1. The Buran has no main engines like the shuttles 3 SSME's located in the back.  All the lifting for the Buran during launch and ascent was done with the attached Energia booster system.  Because the two vehicles are about the same size, the absence of the main engines in the Buran meant that it could carry a somewhat larger payload

  2. The Buran also claimed to have some advantages in the areas production and placement of TPS tiles and better aerodynamic performance.

UPDATE: 01/07/2004

An e-mail was received on 01/07/2004 correcting some of the statements made on this page.  All of the updates with the above data are from that source.  These comments will be kept separate until they are verified and added to the text.

The Buran Analgoe (Horizontal Flight Simulator) OK-GLI was never intented to be an orbital craft with turbojet engines.  Those were fitted for atmospheric testing.  Orbital vehicles had no turbojet engines.  GLI allowed the flight control software to be fine tuned as more and more concrete information became available from the wind tunnels and test spacecraft.

The similarities

Cligh on thumbnail to bring up larger image.

Cross section view of the Buran with the outer skin removed making many components and subsystems visible.

This image contains three different links.

The Buran's ODU system for maneuvering while in orbit.

There are far more similarities between the two orbiters besides the fact that they are relatively the same size and shape.  The Buran-Energia launch stack is a very close match to the Space Shuttle stack but the Buran used different fuel and a different type of engine.  The section view of the Buran with the outer skin removed shows the Buran as having the same crew compartment layout as the Space Shuttle.  All of the crew hatches and thruways are in the exact same places.  The Buran has Electronic equipment sitting on shelves in nearly the same locations as  where the avionics bays would be in the Space Shuttle.  It also appears that the Buran has some of the spherical shaped tanks for storing the fluids and gasses the shuttle needs to operate.  The image to the left labeled, "Buran Schematic", contains a link to a larger version of the image.

The ODU maneuvering system on the Buran is very similar to the OMS/RCS systems of the Space Shuttle.  The image to the left labeled, "ODU System", contains (3) different links to the system assembly, the RCS engine and the OMS engine.

Means of transport

Cligh on thumbnail to bring up larger image. Cligh on thumbnail to bring up larger image.

The Buran riding on the back of a AN225 aircraft specially designed to ferry the orbiter from place to place.  Similar to the Space Shuttle being carried on the back of the 747.  Note: The AN225 is nearly twice the size of a 747.

Sketch of a Space Shuttle orbiter mounted on its 747 aircraft ready to be transported to a different location.

Sketch of a Space Shuttle orbiter being released from its 747 aircraft.  Presumably a depiction of an early flight test.

Post flight damage:

The series of pictures below are a partial record of the damage that Buran returned with from an orbital space flight.  It is believed that much more damage was done but a complete record of the after flight report can not be found.

Buran landing after first orbital flight.

Note discoloration, probably from burning, going up buran's side and around the tail.

Where old shuttles go to die:

Just so you know, when the Russians say they are "storing" what was once going to be a space shuttle worth billions of dollars somewhere in Moscow, what they really mean is that they turned it into a kiddy ride in Gorky Park.

Yes, this is one of the VKK shuttles that was closer than the rest to completion at the time the program was canceled.  To put it nicely we will say it is "on display" in Gorky Park, (we all know the kids play on it).  It is rumored  that two other shuttles at a similar stage of completion to this one were purchased by foreign countries to be displayed in shopping malls.  Those shuttles have supposedly been seen in Australia and Singapore but no proof is available so the story cannot be confirmed.

So if you want to play Cosmonaut or Astronaut for a day get a few buddies together then decide who's going to be the mission commander, copilot, mission specialist etc.  After everyone is in agreement grab some chairs from the kitchen table or even lawn chairs will do just fine along with a couple of sets of flight controllers and head down to the shuttle in the park.  Set up some old stereo equipment on storage shelves in the corners of the mid deck area and your avionics are ready to go.  After three or four beers you can begin to perform some weightless exercises in the crew cabin.

UPDATE: 01/07/2004

The Buran in Gorky Park (OK-TVA) was not an orbiter but a static test vehicle, it was complete and had finished its useful life.

The locations of other test vehicles:
VKK test vehicle locations
(http://www.astronautix.com/craft/buran.htm)

  1. OK-TVA Gorkiy Park, Moscow
    OK-TVA for heating and static vibration tests.
  2. OK-M Outside, Buran safing area, Baikonur (picture attached)
    OK-M was the primary mock-up for parts fit tests.

  3. OK-MT Baikonur (location unknown), Kazakhstan
    OK-MT for technological development and mock-up duties.

  4. OK-KS RKK Energia Plant, Korolev
    OK-KS for complex electronic and electric tests and mock-up duties.

  5. OK-TVI NIIKhimMash, Moscow
    OK-TVI for environmental chamber heat/vacuum tests.

Supplementary Page Navigation Menu

  1. Past and Present News Stories on STS-107

  2. Current Status of Each Space Shuttle

  3. Columbia's Most Recent Overhaul

  4. Reentry of the Buran Space Shuttle

  5. The History and Functioning of HAARP

Copyright © 2003 - 2007 ColumbiasSacrifice.com