Website Navigation and Document Access Pull Down Menu

 
 
 
Go To Home Page

How HAARP fits the model of Columbia's destruction

Updated 03/15/2004

Go To Mission Statement
 
     
 

Supplementary Page Navigation Menu

  1. Past and Present News Stories on STS-107

  2. Current Status of Each Space Shuttle

  3. Columbia's Most Recent Overhaul

  4. Reentry of the Buran Space Shuttle

  5. The History and Functioning of HAARP

 
     
 

When I first started searching for technical information regarding STS-107 and the shuttle program in general, I found many websites that were somewhat less than helpful.  These are a few of the more colorful theories I read.

  • The shuttle was destroyed by a missile of unknown origin.

  • The Chinese destroyed the Columbia using a giant laser or beam weapon.

  • The Russians destroyed the shuttle using a giant laser or beam weapon.

  • Osama Bin Laden snuck aboard the shuttle before launch.

  • Numerology (adding the numbers in the date and dividing by who really cares).

  • Alien friends of Saddam Hussein destroyed the shuttle.

  • Aliens destroyed the shuttle accidentally but rescued the crew before breakup.  (The website had a still from the reentry blown up to the extent that it was not recognizable as such and claimed to see the aliens helping crew members onto the alien ship).

  • There never was a shuttle program and the government is simply trying to cover it up.

  • A spy satellite from an unknown nation was moved into the path of Columbia as it began reentry.

  • God destroyed the shuttle because we don't belong in space.

The only word that popped up universally on these sites was HAARP.  I began researching HAARP simply because I didn't know what it was and managed to turn up dozens of research papers.  Rather than finding what I thought would be a load of crackpot theories, I started seeing a device that could possibly destroy the electronics of an aircraft, spacecraft or missile in the upper atmosphere.  These technical papers dated back to the 80's and early 90's with the history of the concept dating back to the late 50's.  I now see not a crackpot theory but a device that has the potential to cause the damage that resulted in the loss of space shuttle Columbia.

HAARP is presented only as a possibility for the damage done to the space shuttle as it descended into the magnetosphere.  If any other source for such an EMP effect exists it is currently unknown to this investigation.

Things HAARP cannot or did not do

Things HAARP can do

  • HAARP did not destroy the Murrah building in Oklahoma City, 4/19/1995.

  • It did not destroy the World Trade Center or damage the Pentagon on, 9/11/2001.

  • It cannot cause earth quakes or significant weather events anywhere in the world.  (However, it does disrupt the upper atmosphere so this may be debatable).

  • HAARP cannot read your mind or induce thoughts.  You may now remove the aluminum foil from your hats.

  • It is not responsible for any of the various jumbo jet crashes which have occurred in the last few years.  (As far as we know).

  • HAARP can heat up portions of the ionosphere for scientific atmospheric research.

Military research

  • For the military it may be used for global communications especially to submarines.

  • May be used as a ground penetrating radar to locate geological anomalies or underground fortifications.

 

Speculation

  • With significant power input HAARP transmissions may be able to knock down incoming missiles by either destroying the electronics and therefore the missiles guidance system or by changing atmospheric properties or both.

 

The original theories behind the HAARP project were developed in the 1950's as the result of atmospheric hydrogen bomb tests.  These tests created localized disruptions of the ionosphere that lasted for some period of weeks or months and possibly years.  Another byproduct of the tests was a brief but powerful emission of high speed particles now known as an Electro Magnetic Pulse (EMP).  Later on It was determined that the resultant stream of high speed Beta particles of the EMP were capable of destroying electronic equipment well outside of the blast zone.  For the purposes of space warfare, the problem then was to recreate the effects of the thermonuclear blast without detonating a bomb.  The final design for a missile defense system proposed introducing high power low frequency radio waves into the ionosphere using a technique called circular polarization.  This creates streams of high speed beta particles that move along the magnetic field lines as well as stream out into space and back again.

Portions of the patent for the system used at the HAARP facility specifically describe it as a missile defense system.  An outlined version of the patent can be found on The Brother Jonathan website, HAARP Patent.  The patent in its entirety can be viewed and downloaded at the US Patent Office website, US Patent 5,038,664.  The text of the patent states, "The plasma will be contained within adjacent [magnetic] field lines and will drift to form a shell of relativistic particles around a portion of the earth".  A breakdown of the technical discussion contained in the patent explains how such an effect is produced as follows.  Electromagnetic radiation of a given frequency, (1800 to 3600 kHz) transmitted to a region of the atmosphere with an altitude of at least 250 km in conjunction with another region of the atmosphere with an altitude of 1500 km receiving electromagnetic radiation of with a frequency of (20 to 1800 kHz) sets up the required field.  This excitation sustained for 20 minutes causes electrons or beta particles to travel back and forth between the two regions at nearly the speed of light.  These two regions then have a natural tendency to spread out creating the shell of relativistic particles.  Another statement in the patent expresses the usefulness of this shell, "...wherein said shell is formed as an anti-missile shield".  It has been shown that an object, such as a missile,  passing through a field of relativistic particles such as that described here will almost certainly suffer significant damage.  Examples of this damage would be burn through of the outer skin, severe damage to electronic components (even those that are shielded) and the possible ignition of explosives such as the warhead trigger.  Most vehicles passing through such a field would probably see all three types of damage.  Far more detailed explanations are contained in the patent.

When operating in missile defense mode the HAARP transmitter broadcasts high power low frequency radio waves in the circular polarization pattern described in the patent.  Any missile attempting to reenter the atmosphere would pass through the region of high speed particles damaging or destroying its electronics and guidance systems rendering the projectile unable to reach its target or possibly causing it to burn up during reentry.  At the very least the trigger mechanism for the nuclear warhead would be destroyed letting the missile crash safely into the water or land without detonating.  Many of the details of this technology can by found in the related documents shown below as well as a search on the internet.  The official website for the HAARP project is at, www.haarp.alaska.edu/

Marshall Smith at the The Brother Jonathan Gazette is the most credible independent source of information on the HAARP project that has been found so far.  His information includes the history of HAARP and detailed but straight forward descriptions of how it works.  Marshall Smith is also the only individual known to monitor the HAARP signal on a regular basis.  His HAARP log for February 1, 2003 indicates that HAARP was operating in missile defense mode starting about 90 minutes before Columbia's reentry and then for about 90 minutes afterward, about 3 hours total.  The following table is his HAARP log for that morning.

14:15 AM

2HAARP on. 3.39 MHz. Very weak. Military mode

4:42 AM

HAARP still on. Stronger but still faint.

5:25 AM

HAARP still on but very weak

6:15 AM

HAARP still on. -- On Fox News Chan -- first announcement that shuttle is missing -- NASA reports no contact since 6am

6:43 AM

HAARP still on but very weak

7:23 AM

HAARP no longer on. Off about 7:20

1.) Times are Pacific Standard Time.
2.)
Because Marshall Smith is the only known source for this information there is no secondary source for the purposes of verification.

The frequency of 3.39 MHz is that required to produce the shell of relativistic particles as stated above, (3.39 MHz = 3390 kHz).  The stated frequency range is 1800 to 3600 kHz and 3390 kHz falls near the upper end of the range.

Page Notes:

Reference documents for this page are available in the Download page under The history and operation of HAARP.

 

Supplementary Page Navigation Menu

  1. Past and Present News Stories on STS-107

  2. Current Status of Each Space Shuttle

  3. Columbia's Most Recent Overhaul

  4. Reentry of the Buran Space Shuttle

  5. The History and Functioning of HAARP

Copyright © 2003 - 2007 ColumbiasSacrifice.com